WebLayshock sued the Hermitage School District (the district) (defendant), alleging a violation of his First Amendment rights under the United States Constitution. The trial court … Webthe full court on June 3, 2010.2 In Layshock v. Hermitage School District and Snyder v. Blue Mountain School District, the defendant public schools punished students for creating MySpace profiles of their schools’ respective principals. Both students created the profiles off-campus, using non-school computers, during non-school hours.
J.S. v. Blue Mountain School District ACLU Pennsylvania
Web10 dec. 2008 · In December of 2005, Justin Layshock was a seventeen-year old senior at Hickory High School which is part of the Hermitage School District in Hermitage, Pennsylvania. Sometime between December 10 and 14, 2005, while Justin was at his grandmother's house during non-school hours, he used her computer to create what he … http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/j-s-v-blue-mountain-school-district facture camping car
PRECEDENTIAL - United States Courts
Web15 jun. 2011 · In Layshock v. Hermitage School District (3rd Cir. June 13, 2011) (en banc), the court sided with the student. The prevailing standard for when schools can impose discipline for off-campus speech was developed from the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 … Web2 nov. 2011 · Blue Mountain School District, Petitioner v. Terry Snyder, et al., Respondents Hermitage School District, Petitioner v. Justin Layshock, et al., Respondents _____ On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit _____ Amici Curiae Brief of National School Boards Association, American Association ... The Circuit Court set out to determine if a school district can punish a student for expressive conduct that originated outside of the classroom, when that conduct did not disturb the school environment and was not related to any school sponsored event. The court applied the Tinker precedent from 1969, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that student expression may not be suppressed unless school officials reasonably conclude that it will "materially and substantially … facture chateau